It
baffles me that The
Night of the Hunter
made it past the censors in the days of the Hayes Code. For anyone
unfamiliar with it, the Hayes Code was a strict production standard
that all major American studios went by from the 1930s until 1968
when the ratings system was developed. Among other things, it
explicitly banned negative depictions of religious authorities.
My
best guess is that they side-stepped this rule by opening the movie
with a bible verse warning of “false prophets.” Presumably they
explained to the censors that you can't blaspheme if you're film is
inspired by the religion supposedly being blasphemed against.
Robert
Mitchum plays a criminal preacher... or a criminal pretending to be a
preacher... or a preacher who honestly believes that God is OK with
the truly despicable things he does... it isn't really clear. He was
cellmates with a bank robber (Peter Graves) who was executed and
wants to find the man's money. So he marries his widow (Shelley
Winters) and attempts to coerce the information from his children
(Billy Chaplain and Sally Jane Bruce).
The
initial hour of the film consists of this general formula as he tries
to intimidate the son and sweet-talk the daughter into telling him
where the money is hidden. He eventually murders his new wife, and
isolates the children.
To
me, the single most frightening moment is immediately after the
daughter gives in. For just a second, his high-brow speech drops and
gives way to a much more low-class accent (“The dahl! Why sure!
The last place anyone would think to look!”). In this moment you
get a clear view of the wolf in sheep’s clothing that our villain
truly is. And the fact that he's able to maintain his facade so
perfectly in every other scene of the movie is absolutely chilling.
The
remaining half-hour of the movie is actually fairly dull, and exists
mostly to make sure the villain is punished. The children escape and
take refuge with a shotgun-wielding old lady (Lillian Gish) who keeps
their step-father at bay. He attempts to get in, but eventually
resolves himself to sitting outside, intimidating them. Any hope for
an ultimate climax is destroyed when the police arrive and arrest him
without incident. It’s made very clear that the town has turned
against him (they barely avoid a lynching), and that he is certain to
be executed for his crimes.
The
movie then wraps up with a dull speech about how the children will be
OK, because the Hayes code was not willing to bend on the issue of
the children being OK. And the ending is a big disappointment for an
otherwise almost flawless film. You could say that I'm expecting
formula, but there's a reason cliches became cliches. This is the
rare case in which a studio executive should have stormed onto the
set and demanded an ending with gunfire and explosions. If nothing
else, it would have been preferable to this Hayes Code-induce
anti-climax.
HBA Welcome Wagon...
ReplyDeleteSorry for the delay... Wanted to let you know, you are part of the Alliance. Please stop by and check to make sure your link, name etc. is correct. We also are wanting members who have a FACEBOOK and TWITTER to join us as we slowly rebuild the HBA [Info on Site]. Remember to say Thank You and feel free to visit the other HBA Members.
http://horrorbloggeralliance.blogspot.com/
Please visit one of my other site [below] for even more fun and thank you all!
Jeremy [Retro]
HBA Curator
HOLLYWOOD NUTS!
Come Visit: You know you want to know if me or Hollywood... is Nuts?