(note: I won't be identifying actors
as thoroughly as I usually do, because I've decided there are so many
characters, many of which are on screen for comparatively short
periods of time, that I'm not easily able to figure out who the
appropriate actor for each character is.)
Wow, this movie impressed me. The
Paranormal Activity movies
could take some serious lessons from this film. It’s
presented as a mockumentary, giving us the information the
in-universe filmmakers want to present us. Furthermore, much of the
film plays out as a fairly realistic depiction of a major
environmental crisis. The military never shows up to murder
everyone, but the government and corporate interests still want to
cover up their own liability.
We're told this
story by a reporter named Donna. She's apparently leaking the story
to the in-universe filmmakers, because she's been silenced until this
point by the government. Apparently the filmmakers were somehow able
to get their hands on her confiscated footage of the events, and are
adding in bits of her commentary. I'm not going to do the research
to try to figure out how much could be legally done to silence her in
the real world. I'm so happy that the army isn't murdering the
entire town that I'm willing to just accept this.
The film is set in
a town built around Chesapeake Bay. The town's economy is based on
chicken farming, which uses heavy doses of hormones to grow the
chickens to edible sizes as quickly as possible. The chicken
dropping are being dumped in massive amounts into the Bay. As the
town has grown more prosperous, a Desalinization Plant is built to
provide the town with water. We're told that the people of the town
assume that the Plant will remove anything harmful from the water,
not just salt. (Dun dun dun!)
The crisis begins
at a local festival, where people begin vomiting and developing
rashes and boils on their skin. The reactions are quite realistic.
They realize fairly quickly that exposure to water and eating local
seafood seem tied to the disease, and within somewhere between an
hour to a day or so they've realized that there's a new strain of
tongue-eating louse (a parasite usually harmful only to fish) that's
making people sick.
It's in the final
twenty minutes of the film when the CDC finally ties the
hormone-filled chicken manure to the growth. However, the filmmakers
have indicated that this was the cause several times. This is a
touch I love. The filmmakers aren't saving up for a shocking reveal
any more than a real documentary would. They have information, and
they present it to us.
About half an hour
into the film the ante is upped. We're shown a louse at least
three-times the size of a cockroach that bites a man, and fish are
being eaten down to the bone. We're even shown footage of a girl
apparently being attacked and killed in the water, although we're
told her body is never discovered. All the while the Mayor tells
everyone that he hasn't had time to fully examine the issue, but is
sure everything will be fine. His fear is visible, but so is his
concern for his own reputation.
Is the science here
realistic? Clearly not. The reactions, though, feel very real.
We're shown various medical professionals scrambling to deal with an
emergency. Whether parasites growing hundreds of times their natural
size and attacking a species they previously had no interest in is
possible is completely beside the point. Also, I doubt growth
hormones for birds would affect insects at all.
The
gigantic bugs are only on screen a few times, for fairly short
periods. I don't blame them one bit. They clearly didn't have the
budget to make them look particularly good, but could handle boil and
rash make-up just fine. Their most dramatic appearance, crawling out
of character's neck, the image is taken with a low-resolution camera
so that the bad CGI isn't even noticeable.
If there is a major
plot contrivance, it's the failure of the town to be immediately
evacuated. People continue to go about their lives as the bodies are
dropping, rather than immediately running for the hills. I'm willing
to concede this, however, as tracking the infected as they scattered
around the State and Country would make for a much harder narrative
to follow.
Towards the end of
the film there are two scenes of human-on-human violence. The first
is an infected police officer is confronted by two men who try to
convince him to go to the hospital, but the officer believes he'll
die either way. I have mixed feelings for this scene. On the one
hand, it is effective because the scene is so unique within the film,
presenting a human threat otherwise absent from the film. The
officer becomes belligerent and threatens the men with a gun,
eventually shooting one of them. On the other hand, the scene is
resolved far too quickly, with the officer then killing himself. It
was like they just wanted the scene to be over, and not deal with the
emotional fallout of making this character a murderer.
The second scene is
the standard “someone in the back seat” jump scare. I have no
idea why it exists, and it feels quite out of place. Apparently for
this one scene being infected makes you violent. Maybe the woman was
just in a lot of pain, but if that's the case how did she
convincingly hide when she should have been screaming and moaning?
At the end we're
told that the government killed the outbreak by dumping chlorine in
the water, and then paid off the town in exchange for silence. This
is one point that actually seems like the opposite of reality. Why
would the government pay for an ecological catastrophe that was
clearly the fault of corporate chicken farmers? I can certainly
imagine Chris Christie jumping in to negotiate down their payments,
but I'm fairly certain that the government had nothing to do with
this, and would not be paying a “settlement” for it.
Even
with these flaws, however, The Bay
is a strong film. It's definitely worth a movie night.
No comments:
Post a Comment