Time can change our perception of
movies. When The Grudge
first came out, Roger Ebert said of the opening “I'm not sure how
this scene fits into the rest of the movie, but then I'm not sure how
most of the scenes fit into the movie.” Now, in the year 2015,
with the benefit of Wikipedia I can easily figure out how the various
scenes fit into the narrative...I simply don't care.
To summarize: A
Japanese man named Takeo (Takashi Matsuyama) killed his wife Kayako
(Takako Fuji) and son Toshio (Yuya Ozeki), because he read his wife's
diary and realized she was having an affair with an American
professor (Bill Pullman). After this, their spirits killed him, and
the three of them haunt their home and attack anyone who comes
inside.
I haven't seen the
original Japanese film this is based on, but I'm torn on the decision
to set this film in Japan. Rather than setting it in America, the
creators apparently decided it would be easier to justify the use of
English by having a bizarrely disproportionate number of Americans
involved in the story. Not only was the Professor an American, but
the next residents of the apartment were an American couple and the
husband's aging mother (William Mapother, Clea Duvall, and Grace
Zabriskie).
Even more
bizarrely, after the couple are killed, the mother, apparently
suffering from Alzheimer's, remains in Japan for some reason, being
cared for by caretakers who come to see her daily. When her regular
caretaker (Yoko Maki) is killed by the spirits, an American Exchange
Student named Karen (Sarah Michelle Gellar) is sent in her place.
Even if the woman had no family back in the US, I strongly suspect
that the Japanese government would send her to a nursing home in the
States rather than pay for her care.
That's three
independent trips to Japan by Americans who all end up as part of
this story, to say nothing of Karen's boyfriend (Jason Behr). For
the love of God if you're that determined to have Americans in .your
film, just set the film in the US of A. I don't see anything
difficult to culturally translate about “people who are murdered
violently become violent ghosts.”
Putting that aside,
however, I've tried hard to put my finger on why most of the scares
don't work. My best guess is that it's a combination of factors.
Most of the scares are fairly generic, and the movie is far too
willing to show the ghosts. The build-up to the horror isn't
especially tense, either.
All of these
problems can be easily seen in the portrayal of Toshio: he seems to
just exist around the house, and periodically say hello to someone,
who typically doesn't even realize he's a ghost...oh, and he
occasionally meows in the voice of his dead cat, who his father also
killed. How are we supposed to be afraid of something treated with
so little awe or reverence. Granted, most of the attacking is done
by Kayako and Takeo, but having a ghost so open about his own
existence cheapens the concept.
More
significantly, though, the scares passed too quickly. The ghosts
show up, then they attack...next scene. I found myself mentally
comparing the film to The Woman in Black,
a film that had a truly dazzling extended ghost attack (if you've
seen the movie, you know exactly what I'm talking about). There were
a number of sequences here that could have been frightening, if
they'd been given proper time.
A perfect example
of this is the famous shower scene. Karen is showering, and we see a
hand start to emerge from the back of her head. She feels it,
and...that's it. She's scared, but we're still anticipating. We're
hungry for more, and we're not being fed.
The
movie ends with Karen burning the house, and the implication that she
inadvertently freed the evil. I intend to review the sequel (the
first one, at least) next. I certainly hope it's an improvement over
this entry.
There are worse
films out there? Sure. But, honestly, this movie kind of made me
wish I was watching them. I'd rather see amusing trash than this
overly slow bore-fest.
No comments:
Post a Comment