I'm not sure if the child actors in
this film are bad, or if they're just badly directed with poor
dialogue. Notably, the actor who plays the main character (John
White) is still working as an adult. This makes me inclined to think
its not the director's fault.
That said, the premise of this episode
isn't terrible. It's an idea that's both relatable and frightening.
An act of sibling rivalry leads to our protagonist being punished.
Even though I'm an only child, having been a kid at all I can
definitely understand the desire for revenge on other children.
Our protagonist, Michael (White) has a
younger sister named Tara (Kristen Bone) who seems to take joy in his
suffering. She intentionally embarrasses him at his birthday party
in front of his crush, tripping him so that he face-plants in his
cake, and shooting him with a Super Soaker full of gunk and running
to his parents when he chases her. These are really the only
examples we get, because the episode only has twenty minutes after
commercials, but it gets the message across: Tara is a little
monster, and his parents don't see it.
Then, his father (Larry Mannell) gets a
Cuckoo Clock. Mannell is the only actor in this episode who I like
without qualification. His performance actually seems to change in
subtle ways over the course of the story, as we see him at different
points in his life to reflect his maturation as a parent. In the
present he's very no-nonsense, in the past he comes across as making
more vain attempts to relate to his child on an equal level,
something clearly impossible.
And with that, I've given away the
conflict: Michael overhears his father threatening to punish Tara if
there is any damage to the clock, assuming it would be her. Michael,
naturally, sees his chance for revenge. Sneaking out of bed, he
twists the head on the cuckoo around, and the next morning wakes up
to a repeat of his birthday party.
I'm a little unclear on what happens at
the party. It seems to be implied that Michael is somehow forced to
relive the most humiliating moments, even with foreknowledge of them,
but later in the episode he seems to have complete free-will within
the past. Maybe the clock just decided to have fun in this scene.
At first, Michael assumes he's caught
in a time loop, circling the same three days over and over again. No
such luck, as he wakes up as a six-year-old the following day. This
is the point when it hits Michael: if the clock continues to send him
back in time he could very easily cease to exist. He attempts to get
to the antique shop where his father purchased the clock, and we get
a false scare involving a creepy stranger. While the clock is there,
the shop is closed for the day, and he finds himself dragged back
home by his father.
While Michael assumes that's that end,
we as an audience know both that there's time left in the episode,
and that it would hardly be an acceptable conclusion if he never
reached the clock. So, he gets one last chance...as a one-year-old.
I'm not sure if his parents actually went to the antique shop on his
first birthday, or if the clock wanted to give him a chance. I lean
towards the latter, actually, it seems a bit more satisfying to think
the Clock merely wanted to teach young Michael a lesson.
I also find it unlikely that the
parents of a one-year-old in a shop full of expensive things would
leave him alone in his stroller long enough for him to get out of the
stroller, walk over to a clock on his one-year-old legs, and twist
the head of a cuckoo-bird back into the correct direction (yes, it's
backwards before he twisted it in the future, just go with it). With
that, Michael finds himself back in the future, being lectured by his
Dad that he shouldn't touch the clock.
This is one of the few, if not the
only, Goosebumps episode
where the twist is actually to the protagonist's benefit. The final
twist: Tara no longer exists. The clock had a series of panels that
listed the years, and in the shop Michael accidentally knocked off
1988, the year that Tara was born. The episode ends with him
contemplating that he should find a way to bring her back, but seems
extremely uncertain if he wants to.
I'm not really sure
how to interpret this final twist. Is the clock's magic completely
without sentience, just wiping out important events in Michael's life
that happened in 1988? Did the clock decide to reward him for some
perverse reason? Or did it simply fail to realize that removing Tara
would not be a proper punishment for the brother who hated her? I
really don't have an answer that I like.
The episode isn't
bad, I can say that much. It's cheesy, could use better direction
and dialogue, and as with many kids' shows seems a bit rushed at
times. But, it actually has some moments that are unsettling as an
adult. And the actions of our protagonist do feel like something a
kid would do. If you want to revisit this show, give it a watch.
Assuming you are taking comments, two of the questions you raised are answered by the story version:
ReplyDelete* There are more scenes of Tara being horrible in the book throughout Michael's time travel; she is cruel to the family cat, got him beaten up by a bully, and even her baby self bites his finger. I wonder if she is supernatural herself?
* Michael has free will in the Birthday, he realizes this when carrying the cake, but despite avoiding Tara's foot, she pulls him down from under the table.
Happy to take comments, I hate that I rarely get them. And thanks.
DeleteNo problem.
DeleteHappy to give them.
Kinda of an unusual ending here. Most other stories would have him realize he loved Tara, she wasn't as bad as he thought, he did something to upset her earlier, or something along those lines.
Instead he erases her from existence and decides she isn't worth bringing back.
No Goosebumps style, he erased himself from existence or something, he gets away with it.
So I think its a unique ending.