Clive Barker is both my favorite writer
and my favorite director. I'm quite disappointed that he hasn't
returned to the director's chair since Lord of Illusions,
but Mick Garris does well with this adaptation. It's a bit strange
as adaptations go, because while the episode is credited as based on
a short-story by Barker, his website says he actually wrote a 45-page
treatment specifically for Masters of Horror,
which Garris adapted. If you're going to write 45 pages I'm not sure
why you wouldn't just write the script, but I'm not Clive Barker.
Barker has a
thematic connection to Lovecraft, but in many ways is the opposite
side of the same coin. They both deal in cosmic horror, but to
Lovecraft the human perception of the universe is unimportant to
anyone except the human perceiving it. To Barker, however, human
experiences are often the only things that matter, and it's those
very experiences that can be so dangerous to us. While in lesser
hands this could be like saying “clap your hands if you believe,”
Barker has a way of giving ideas and concepts a visceral quality.
These are creations of the most primal parts of our brains, not
simply phantoms we can wish away.
A writer named Rob
Hanisey (Tyron Leitso) moves into Highberger House, a boarding house
established in the 1930s by a rich, frustrated would-be writer. The
House provides room and board to unpublished authors until they
become published. In practice this means that the house provides an
indefinite home for a bunch of hacks. Some of them, like Rob,
continue to have delusions of grandeur. Others, like Everett Neely
(Christopher Lloyd), have long given up hope, and only continue
writing at all because it allows him to avoid homelessness.
Hanisey begins to
encounter a woman named Valerie (Clare Grant), running around the
boarding house nude. She asks for help in trying to escape from a
monster played by Tony Todd. The creature has an intentionally
pretentious name, but is credited simply as “The Beast.” Rob
becomes determined to save Valerie, even as the other tenants tell
him he's clearly hallucinating.
Both Valerie and
the Beast, as it turns out, are creations of the house. The fallen
dreams of the house took shape in the form of the only really decent
work of fiction produced by the residents: A collaboration between
the jaded Neely, the friendly but predatory Bruce Sweetland (Jonathan
Watton), and sexually frustrated lesbian ex-nun Patricia Dunbar (Suki
Kaiser). Neely provided the creature from an earlier novel he wrote
in his youth, Patricia created Valerie out of her anger and lust, and
Bruce interviewed vagrants to provide the story with plenty of
victims and appropriate deaths.
The Beast begins
picking off his own authors, hoping to free himself by preventing
them from writing an ending. Valerie's relation to the Beast is
fascinating: while she runs from him, she often seems extremely
cooperative, resisting only as the story calls for it. She willingly
joins him when he kills Bruce, and offers Patricia a kiss before she
dies. She recognizes her existence as tied to her role as a victim,
and so she plays that role. Beneath it all, though, she's on The
Beast's team.
This is an episode
that tells you the twist in advance: After Bruce's death, Neely
suggested that Rob might have been an aspect of the story that Bruce
had been working on. Tipping their hand like this in advance
actually makes the ending fairly surprising. Reverse psychology wins
it all!
Rob destroys the
Beast, but Valerie disintegrates when she leaves the House, and Rob's
entire body turns to pages in the novel. The Beast failed. He was
destroyed by the noble hero, and once rescued Valerie and her rescuer
no longer had a reason to be.
The episode ends
with me completely unsure of what did or did not just happen.
Valerie says “they finished it,” so are the authors not dead?
Was Rob just their hallucination? Or are there some other writers
entirely guiding the story? Did Bruce write his own death?
Garris has made his
career on Stephen King adaptations that stay reasonably faithful to
the source material. That same style works here, where every scene
is exactly as I imagine Barker would have written it. Garris has a
talent for understanding other people's material. I'm glad this
episode offered so few answers.
No comments:
Post a Comment