I was somewhat concerned that I would
come into Pride and Prejudice and Zombies
at something of a disadvantage. I listened to the audiobook some
years back when I had a car trip, and remember the plot mostly in
broad strokes. I've never read the original Pride and
Prejudice in any form, and have
only seen bits of the adaptations.
That said, enough
of the film is original that it's easy for me to see there wasn't a
lot of interest in faithfulness beyond the basic joke. The fate of
Mr. Wickham, in particular, is absolutely nothing like either book.
In fact, as far as I can tell, virtually everything in the final act
is connected to Jane Austen in only the vaguest ways.
I'm
inclined to say that the novel would have been difficult to film.
The movie effectively changes the genre of the story. Seth
Grahame-Smith created a farce, where the plot of Pride and
Prejudice happened almost
unaltered, despite the presence of the undead and the Kung Fu skills
of the Bennett sisters. Particularly in a post-Seltzer and Friedberg
world, where spoofs are so widely viewed as cheap humor, I'd question
how accepting the audience would be of this kind of story.
In this version the
undead are treated as a very real threat, and seriously alter the
events of the story into something of an exploitation film. Also,
newly turned zombies apparently become evil and start eating brains
before they lose their intelligence, so we do get some creepy scenes
of zombified individuals talking quite intelligently to their
would-be victims. There's even some discussion of making peace with
the undead.
While
this is probably the best route that could have been taken with a
film adaptation, sadly there are still some fairly major problems.
The film feels like it should be longer, although I don't know who
would sit through a Pride and Prejudice and Zombies
film that significantly crossed the 2-hour mark. Many of the events
of the original novel seem to just happen here because they have to,
without appropriate build-up. Furthermore, on the zombie side I feel
like much of the exposition is rushed, and desperately in need of
more world building.
It's
not a bad film, and does manage to score some real laughs, and a few
decent scares. However, it's far from the comedic masterpiece I
imagine many people would imagine it to be. Then again, I doubt that
film could even exist in any form longer than an SNL skit.
No comments:
Post a Comment