(Author’s note: Dawn of the Dead as a parody of consumerism has been so thoroughly discussed that I decided it was better to simply not bother with it. There have literally been college courses taught on this premise, and I have nothing new to say on it.)
George Romero has said that the social
commentary in Night of the Living Dead was accidental, but
once he realized what he’d done, he had to continue it for the
remainder of the Dead series. I think most people would agree
that, at the minimum, he’d overplayed his hand by the fourth film,
Diary of the Dead, and simply become too blatant. However,
the second film, Dawn of the Dead, is an undisputed
masterpiece.
To really set this movie apart from
Night, Romero set up a group of protagonists who could be far
more effective than the everyman heroes of the previous film. Peter
(Ken Foree) and Roger (Scott Reiniger) were both SWAT team members,
while Stephen (David Emge) is a helicopter pilot for a local news
station who allows them greater mobility (limited by the helicopter’s
fuel). The final member of the main cast is Francine (Gaylen Ross),
another staff member from the news station who, while initially
lacking any notable skills, is quick to learn both the use of guns,
and how to fly the helicopter.
The movie uses these abilities to
underscore one point: The zombies are of absolutely no threat, as
long as the protagonists work together and remain rational. The
protagonists are able to fortify themselves and acquire guns. Under
no circumstances could the zombies out think them. Only
recklessness, and human stupidity could possibly allow the zombies to
overcome these heavily armed and fortified individuals... but
fortunately, humans have such stupidity in spades.
Roger gets stupid roughly halfway
through the movie due to his own personal arrogance. As a result, he
is bitten. This feels quite natural. He’s not a machine, and he’d
eventually ceased to see the zombies as a serious threat as they’d
failed to kill any of the main characters up to that point. Even
after he’s bitten, Roger continues to believe against all reason
that he can fight through the transformation into a zombie. Peter’s
eventual decision to kill him leaves us creepily uncertain of whether
or not his boast was legitimate. He shoots him just as his skin
turns gray and he begins to growl, but before he’s able to show any
signs of aggression.
So, we trust each other until someone
becomes a burden? If so, then why should we ever trust anyone at
all, if they’ll inevitably turn on us when we need them the most?
The movie rubs our face in this paradox. The characters can only
survive by working together, but what reason do they have to work
together if their cooperation is dependent on their value to the
group? Romero doesn’t even pretend that there’s an easy answer
to this. Instead, he shows us rationality balanced against empathy
in a sadistic tango.
The remaining three are then confronted
by a group of bikers who storm the mall, allowing the zombies to
enter. This section of the film reminds me of the controversy during
Hurricane Katrina when the media reported a white couple as “finding”
food at a local grocery store, while a black individual was
“looting.” While the race issues aren’t present, there seems
to be an element of stereotyping, and arguably of class. The bikers
storm into the mall and begin taking things. This is literally no
different from what the protagonists have been doing for most of the
film and Peter wants to simply let them pass. The mall still has
plenty of defensible positions, and the bikers’ raid will matter
little if they remain smart and avoid the zombies. However, Stephen
insists that the mall is “ours,” and forces a gunfight with the
bikers, resulting in needless bloodshed and his own death.
The movie was originally supposed to
end with Peter and Francine committing suicide, realizing that human
survival in this world was simply impossible. Romero decided that he
liked the characters too much, and so they flew away with what little
fuel was left in the helicopter to an unknown fate. This is another
point of contention among fans, but I feel the ending works. Human
life is to be savored, even if it’s likely to be fleeting.
This is a movie to be seen. It’s
best watched as a follow-up to Night, as the two movies
together allow you to observe the escalation. We start with a mob in
one film, which escalates into an army in the second. The quality of
the later movies in the Dead series can be debated, but no
film buff’s experience is complete without those two.
No comments:
Post a Comment