What We Do in the
Shadows is a fun movie. It’s
a movie that’s unlikely to be remembered in twenty years as the
state of the genre advances. But, if nothing else, it is fun.
The
movie is a vampire comedy. It’s not exactly a biting satire, nor a
genius character piece. The basic joke of monsters living in a flat
in modern day New Zealand isn’t some great new
innovation. Nor is the decision to present it as a mockumentary.
Basically, we get The Munsters
meets This is Spinal Tap.
This
is a movie that doesn’t work on paper, but is somehow made to work
by the talent of the people
behind it. We have and hour and a half to follow these characters,
five vampires a two humans. At times the story does seem a bit
stretched, and I get the impression this would likely have worked
better as several episodes of a mini-series. However, somehow the
actors make it work and drive home every moment they’re on screen.
The
movie starts with several vampires living as flatmates. The oldest
is Petyr (Ben Fransham), an 8,000-year-old vampire with a Count Orlok
look, who mostly keeps to himself and remains quiet. Viago (Taika
Watiti) is an 18th-century
dandy who came to New Zealand from Europe pursuing a human woman, who
eventually fell in love with someone else. Vladislav (Jermaine
Clement) is a former master hypnotist and shape shifter who, while
much younger than Petyr, seems to be a bit past his sell-by date, and
is uncomfortable about his failing abilities. The youngest of the
group, Deacon (Jonathan Brugh), is a former Nazi and a complete slob.
To
the extend that the film even has a plot it revolves around Nick
(Cori Gonzalez-Macuer). Nick is brought into the house by Deacon’s
human “familiar” Jackie (Jackie Van Beek), who mistakes him for a
virgin. Running from the upstairs vampires, he accidentally stumbles
across Petyr and finds himself turned into a vampire.
Nick’s
presence is something of a mixed blessing to the group. On the one
hand, Nick is a blithering idiot who proudly announces he’s a
vampire to the world (the irony that the others would complain about
this, while letting a documentary film crew follow them around, is
acknowledged). However, he also brings his human friend Stu (Stu
Rutherford) into the house, who introduces the vampires to modern
technology, and quickly becomes more popular than Nick himself.
The
remaining relevant threads are Jackie’s attempt to persuade Deacon
to make her a vampire (it’s implied vampires regularly lie to their
familiars to keep them enthralled, when they have no intentions of
turning them), the buildup to an annual masquerade of supernatural
creatures, and a vampire hunter killing Petyr because of Nick’s
stupidity. If these threads feel like they have nothing to do with
each other, that’s because they have absolutely nothing to do with
each other. The movie mostly functions as a slice-of-life. Most of
the plot-points are eventually resolved, but those resolutions
usually take mere moments.
Overall,
this is a movie worth watching once. I don’t see myself coming
back to it, but I laughed at the jokes. They’re not cutting-edge
humor, but they were delivered with the wit and energy necessary to
make me enjoy them anyway. Honestly, I’d kind of like to see a
sequel, just to revisit these characters.
No comments:
Post a Comment