Wednesday, October 26, 2016

Wednesday Review: Ouija: Origin of Evil







Two years ago the ship that was Ouija sank. The film turned enough of a profit to basically obligate the studio to make another one, but I seriously doubt that anyone expected anything of value to come out of this. So, I suppose we all assumed that they would simply dive down to the wreckage, and loot what treasure was left, or start fresh with a new story and christen a totally different ship the Ouija.

Instead, rising horror star Mike Flanagan apparently decided he was going to dive down into the wreckage with a bucket, and bail water until the ship was raised. To our shock, he succeeded, and we now have a Ouija movie that is in-continuity with the first, that is actually floating above the water. We’re so impressed that Flanagan actually pulled it off, that we don’t really care that it can’t do much except float barely above the water-line of mediocrity, and the film now sits with an RT rating of 80% to the original’s 7%.

I know that seems like an insanely complicated metaphor, but I spent so much time thinking it up that I had to use it. To get into the more serious reviewing, this is a movie with a lot of baggage, from both the original film, and Hasbro. That said, Flanagan works with what he has.

I’m also fairly certain there are some retcons here (although I have yet to subject myself to a second viewing of the first film). While this is the story of a medium’s daughter being possessed by an evil spirit as established in the first film, the medium was now a fake who finds herself beginning to believe. The context in which all of this happens has been radically changed. I believe the intention is to treat Lina, the older daughter of the medium who appeared as an old lady in the original film, as an unreliable narrator, and this as the “real” story. Although, honestly, it wouldn’t be hard to pass this version off as another wild tale spun by Lina.

The movie suffers mainly when it reminds us what it is. Some of the special effects seem to look bad precisely because they’re aping the awful effects of the first film. I strongly suspect that the man who made Oculus could have done better, if he didn’t have consistency to worry about. It also bugs me to think that a fake medium, who’s entire profession is based on showmanship, would buy an off-the-shelf Ouija board, rather than making her own custom talking board, but at some level this movie has to be a commercial.

On the up side, the movie has some fairly interesting ideas. In particular, it plays around what the idea of what possession really means, and the line between a real medium and a fake. If that sounds truly baffling, it’s because I honestly don’t want to spoil some of the major twists of the film for my readers.

Is this movie scary? It has it’s moments, but not as many of them as a movie made entirely by Flanagan likely would have had. I feel like he did everything he could with the material, but it’s still a toy-commercial horror movie and prequel to one of the worst movies in recent years. There’s only so much he could manage.

So, check it out on DVD. It’ll wait.

No comments:

Post a Comment