Starting this review
out on a complete tangent: when I was in High School I used to love
Ebert and Roeper. (my
blooming as a movie buff came too late for Siskel). In 2003, I sided
with Roeper on Terminator 3.
He accused Ebert of contradicting himself by saying both that the
film was mindless action, and that the film left questions
unanswered. Ebert's answer was “I don't want my questions
answered, I want my confusion resolved!”
This
episode made me understand that quote. Chance (Ethan Embry) spends
most of the episode talking to a doppelganger of himself. Most of
the episode seems to imply that this is just a visualization of his
inner monologue, and he discovers how ruthless he can be to escape a
desperate situation. However, a single scene shows Chance and the
doppelganger carrying a dead body together.
So,
is this Fight Club-style
insanity? Is this a supernatural being? If either of these are the
case, why isn't Chance acting like a copy of himself showing up and
offering to help him with cynical advice isn't the least bit strange?
Has this been an ongoing thing?
Beyond
that, I'm getting tired of saying “this movie/episode is saved by
the acting.” Yes, Embry does a great job, but this is basically a
simple story of one guy who kills several people due to his poor
impulse control, with an unexplained gimmick thrown on top of it.
Chance
and his wife (Christine Chatelain) are on the verge of destitution
due to Chance favoring get-rich-quick schemes over steady work. He's
convinced that he's finally found his pay-off after an antique dealer
named Walter (Vondie Curtis-Hall) tells him about a rare vase in the
hands of another collector, who doesn't know it's value. Chance
borrows money to buy the vase for Walter, only to be told Walter had
misidentified it's time-period, and it was worth a quarter of what
Chance had paid.
Curtis-Hall
does a good job here as well. He manages to make you legitimately
unsure if he's running a con with the other dealer, as Chance
suggests, or if he just misidentified the vase from a distance. I
think a strong argument can be made that it was a con, but the
episode makes the right choice by never fully confirming this.
Either way, Chance kills him in a fight over the money, setting off
the events for the rest of the episode.
Chance
needs to clean his tracks, find the money he promised his wife, and
get clear of the crime scene before the murder comes to light. It's
at this point that the doppelganger shows up, played by Embry as a
far snarkier, more confident version of Chance. He feels that Chance
has allowed himself to be screwed over repeatedly throughout his
life, and pushes him towards more and more violence.
Things
get more complicated when Chance sets off the fire-alarm by mistake,
summoning a rent-a-cop (Ricardo Betancourt). Chance nearly talks him
down, before the officer discovers Walter's body, forcing Chance to
kill him as well. Then, Walter's wife (Ellen Ewusie) shows up. Her
murder takes more discussion with his doppelganger, but it eventually
follows (also, her husband's antique store has a shower for some
unexplained reason).
After
he kills her, he heads home without the money, and imagines an
alternate version of the day in which he was given his money without
incident, and holds out Walter's severed fingers to his wife,
thinking that he's holding money. His wife freaks out, and the
doppelganger killers her...or makes Chance kill her, or...something.
Then the police come, and arrest Chance, or his doppelganger, or
someone played by Ethan Embry!
This
episode has some memorable moments, but for the most part the story
is just too confusing for it's own good, and has very little to offer
outside of it's gimmick. The story would probably be ten minutes
long without the doppelganger, and ultimately he contributes very
little beyond filler dialogue. Are there worse stories? Yeah. But
there's also far better. At best, this episode falls right smack dab
in the middle.
No comments:
Post a Comment