Wednesday, June 29, 2016

Wednesday Review: Independence Day Resurgence


I decided to review this movie because the scenario of an Alien Invasion does fall, broadly speaking, under “horror.” Indeed, the original Independence Day had some truly intense scenes. That said, however, this film never really gives us that intensity, instead acting more as a pure action film.

As for the quality of the film, however, I’d say it’s probably worth a rental. In understanding what Roland Emmerich was doing I thought of two things. Firstly, Moviebob’sreview of the original film, where he explains how it acted as a call for Global Unity. Secondly, I thought of Francis Ford Coppola’s comments that The Godfather: Part 3 should be seen as the coda of The Godfather series, rather than it’s conclusion. Both of these are important in understanding what Emmerich created with this film.

The thing I noticed most about this movie was just how standard much of the plot was. Most of the creativity seemed to go into showing us Roland Emmerich’s idealized world, in which humanity had united and become a stronger people as a result. Notably, where the original film shows humans overcoming petty differences to unite, in Resurgence all the tactical mistakes the humans make are made for the best possible reasons, with everyone determined to protect their world at all cost.

This makes me suspect that Emmerich’s goal was simply to give Independence Day a coda. He wanted to show us the world that the first film called for, and threw in another alien invasion, because how else could he get us to see it? We’re not going to sit through a mockumentary on 20 years post-Independence Day (...okay, I probably would, but most people wouldn’t).

The single most interesting character in this movie is an African “warlord” who has spent ten years fighting a war against surviving aliens. Firstly, I find him fascinating as a parallel to President Whitmore. While his territory is apparently not recognized internationally as a country, the film shows him being treated with roughly the respect afforded a World Leader, and like Whitmore in the first film he acts as a leader who takes a direct hand in the fighting, not seeing himself as above the battles.

More significantly, though, it’s mentioned that this “warlord” replaced his more brutal father...and as far as we can see he’s just as focused on the good of humanity as anyone else. I think that ties into the theme of the “better world.” Twenty years later the last remnants of the bad world have died away, and in the new world the closest thing that even exists to a barbarian is a somewhat gruff and grumpy man with a heart of gold.

And yes, there’s a sequel hook. I don’t think there will be a sequel based on the box office, but if there is I expect it will be another coda. They seem to be setting us up to show us even more unity and an even better world. I’ll probably see it, though, if it happens.

So, as I said at the beginning of this review, I like this movie enough to recommend renting it. If you have fond memories of the original, this will likely be a nice trip down memory lane. But, it isn’t creative enough with it’s alien invasion, nor does it try to be. So, I can’t in good conscience tell anyone to see it in theatres...also, yeah, not horror...

No comments:

Post a Comment