Preface: I accept Tobe Hooper as the
director of this film. Yes, Spielberg had a very strong creative
role in the production of the movie. Producers often do. That does
not make him the director. Shut up with your conspiracy theories,
and stop hurting Hooper's career.
Everything's that's old is new again.
In my second viewing of Poltergeist, I realized that I was
watching Insidious made three decades earlier, with a happy
ending... and then the sequel for Insidious gave us back the
happy ending. So, really, the only difference between the two is
that both Insidious movies combined have a longer running
time, and Poltergeist caused more property damage, because the
house was destroyed at the end.
The basic set-up of this movie is that
a real estate agent (Craig T Nelson) and his family (JoBeth Williams
as his wife, and Dominique Dunn, Oliver Robbins, and Heather O'Rourke
as his children) are living in a neighborhood in which he is trying
to sell homes, and comes under assault from a presence that wants to
steal their children. This basic set-up allows for a number of
freaky scenes that eventually culminates with the aforementioned
destruction of the house. I somewhat suspect that the ending
required the house to be destroyed simply because the entity had
attacked them so many times and been repelled that any other ending
would have left us with serious doubt as to whether it was actually
gone, rather than simply in a momentary lull.
One frequent problem I have with
reviewing these movies is that I have to separate “is scary” from
“scares me.” There's certainly a distinction, as many things
that others find freaky don't bother me in the slightest, and vice
versa. In the case of this movie, the only scene that bothered me at
all was when the father had to threaten his spectrally-kidnapped
daughter (O'Rourke) with a spanking. While I don't have children,
somehow I did relate to the issue. The father had to acknowledge
himself as being more threatening to the child than the mother, since
he was charged with discipline. The alternative to this
acknowledgment was the loss of his daughter.
However, there are many other scenes
that I do acknowledge as “scary.” In fact, the entire film is a
long montage of the spirits doing bizarre and freaky things, up to
and including kidnapping children into an alternate universe between
life and death. That's not a criticism. I certainly don't expect
otherworldly entities to behave in a manner that humans would find
rational. So, their failure to do so makes perfect sense.
The thing that keeps us grounded in the
plot is the human characters. Two parents are desperately trying to
defend their children. That constant is what keeps us anchored
within the movie; the transition of the characters from normality, to
excitement at the possibility of the supernatural, to fear, to
determination.
This movie is good, but often seems to
lack direction, and really drags on too long. While I see the
appeal, and would definitely recommend horror fans check it out, the
remake actually entertained me more, simply because it did a better
job of streamlining the plot. Still, I think my opinion is clearly
in the minority here, and I definitely recommend checking the movie
out.
No comments:
Post a Comment