Showing posts with label Steven Spielberg. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Steven Spielberg. Show all posts

Friday, June 24, 2016

100 Scariest Movie Moments: #1 Jaws

Re-watching classic films is always a fascinating experience for me. Rarely, if ever, did the people making the movie know that they were making history. If it’s a classic movie I’ve only seen a few times, as I have with Jaws, I find myself hitting “play” with the unconscious expectation that I’ll immediately be bombarded with classic scenes, only to find myself seeing a story unfold in which those scenes are only a tiny part.

The thing that struck me first with Jaws was how it actually took a few moments for the classic music to build up to the point at which most parodies start. The build-up is what always seems to get lost in our collective memory, even though that build-up is what elevated the movie to classic status in the first place. The movie takes time to develop its three leads, and even more time to turn them into a team.

In broad terms, the three in question could be seen as the classic “Power Trio” of Kirk, Spock, and McCoy. Hooper (Richard Dreyfuss), the Oceanographer, is our intellectual. Quint (Robert Shaw), the salty sea captain, is our passionate and emotional member. Finally, Police Chief Martin Brody (Roy Scheider) is the balancing point between the two and serves as our protagonist.

That said however, the movie also subverts expectations. Hooper can be extremely passionate, and he and Quint are both miles ahead of Brody in their knowledge of the sea and of sharks. Both also show off their extensive collections of scars from run-ins with dangerous sea creatures while Brody looks on. The two come into conflict mainly in terms of tactics. In short, the film uses the broad strokes of archetypes as frames around which to build complex characters.

If there really is someone out there somewhere who hasn’t seen this movie, you need to. No pop culture reference, plot summary or parody can capture what’s in this movie. Tension builds to the point of eruption. It’s well-known now that the decision to only rarely show the shark was made because of the poor quality of the animatronics, but it works.

To describe this movie is to turn what’s art in practice into tedium. We open on a teenaged girl going for an evening swim, and promptly being pulled under the water. When her body is discovered, the Mayor refuses to close the beaches, even as Chief Brody recommends that he do so. There’s an attack during the first swimming day of summer, forcing the mayor to give in and close them for a brief twenty-four hours. A Tiger Shark is captured, but Oceanographer Hooper notices that the bite-radius is wrong. Unfortunately, Hooper’s tongue-lashing can’t convince the Mayor to re-close the beaches. Another attack on the 4th of July finally gives us a glimpse of the shark, and convinces the three men to hunt it themselves in Fisherman Quint’s boat, which makes up the final act of the film.

See how boring that sounds? In practice though, every scene is necessary for the build up. The shark is a threat that we’ve waited well over an hour for, and the confrontation drags out for another forty minutes as the men struggle to subdue a creature that can take pretty much anything that any weapon they have on board is capable of dishing out, and eventually of even sinking their boat. They’re up against a force of nature. Gunshots are ignored, the decision for Hooper to dive in with a cage to try to stab the shark in the mouth with a syringe of poison is an act of utter desperation, and it eventually takes an exploding barrel of compressed air to successfully end him. Only by the dumbest of luck did the barrel land in the shark’s mouth at all.

Of course, this does bring me to one question: Do I think this movie deserves its place perched high atop this list? I can safely say that the top 3, Jaws, The Exorcist, and Alien, are easily the winners in terms of sheer universal terror. Numbers 4 and 5, The Texas Chainsaw Massacre, and Psycho are both Masterpieces, well deserving of their rankings. However, there’s something deep and profound in those top 3, to the point that I literally cannot imagine anyone sitting down to watch them and not being frightened.

Picking a true “winner” of those three is like being asked to pick the best Da Vinci; kinda’ pointless when you’re dealing with such great work. That said though, I personally would have put Alien on top, with Jaws running a close second. (Yes, I know this seems to contradict my Exorcist review, but my statement there concerned the biases of others, not my own.)

It’s no coincidence that these three films were made within a six-year period in the 1970s. It was a time when creativity was successfully combined with mass-market appeal. It was a time when studios tried to reign in the excesses of directors while still respecting their talent. The only movies to have come out in my lifetime which can even be considered in the same category as these films are The Devil’s Rejects and Hard Candy. I hope to see more of this type of film making within before I die. And with the rise of new technology, the capacity is certainly there. Sadly, much of our talent seems to choose meta over sincere, and suspension of disbelief over believability.

And on that unrelated rant, I round off this list. It’s been a long, hard slog, but well worth it.

Friday, November 6, 2015

100 Scariest Movie Moments: #67 Duel

I’ve debated whether or not Duel deserves to be called “the only Made-For-TV movie to make this list.” The version I watched was the extended, 90-minute version, specifically made for theatrical release in Europe. That said though, it never got a theatrical release in its country of origin (the United States) as far as I can tell, and it was made to be shown on television. However, I’ve decided that this is a stupid question to be asking, and I’ve limited myself to “this is a good movie, that we probably wouldn’t remember if it hadn’t been directed by Steven Spielberg at a time when no one cared who Steven Spielberg was.”



The movie is about at traveling salesman (Dennis Weaver) who passes an 18-wheeler. The driver, who we never see clearly, passes him back in a fit of road rage. This game continues until the next stop. And from there on the movie becomes a game of cat-and-mouse from one stop the next, with the truck driver becoming increasingly aggressive and increasingly violent towards the salesman, eventually trying to kill him.



It would probably be a mistake to say that either character undergoes “development.” We don’t find out a lot that’s significant about the salesman, and we find out nothing about the driver. However, in place of traditional development, we have the two characters gradually adapting to the situation. The salesman’s priorities shift as the driver becomes more aggressive. Initially, he’s simply concerned about getting to his destination. Then he’s concerned about avoiding the truck driver. And finally, he’s simply trying to ensure his own survival.



The truck driver meanwhile starts out as merely being annoying before his driving becomes frantic and dangerous. This creates a fairly episodic narrative, in which the tensions gradually rise as the incidents between the two drivers become increasingly deadly. For the first hour or so of the movie, the truck driver seems unwilling to harm the salesman while witnesses are around. So the salesman is able to stop at a diner to reflect on his situation, as well as seek out a confrontation with the truck driver in person. However, this doesn’t work out, since he’s unable to determine which diner patron is the truck driver.



The final straw which brings us into the last act of the film appears to be the salesman trying to contact the police. The truck driver levels the phone booth, and from then on pays no regard to witnesses. His sole focus is now murder.



The movie is not realistic. There are times when the salesman is out of the truck driver’s sight, so logically he should have the option of taking another route or turning around entirely, but this option is never even considered. His only attempt to simply avoid the truck driver is to stop his car by the side of the road and take a nap, which proves completely ineffective since the truck driver simply waits for him. Still, the purpose of this movie is not to portray a realistic method of dealing with road rage. It’s to put two characters into conflict, from which only one of them can emerge. That’s literally in the title of the movie.



Of course, I suppose that you could justify the duel portrayed in this film as simply being a matter of pride. Dennis Weaver does an excellent job of establishing the salesman as cocky, but not unlikable. Meaning that towards the end of the movie, his attempts to “win” the duel don’t necessarily come across merely a struggle to survive, because he’s scared. He’s also mad, and that shines through the performance.



The movie also benefits vastly from a premise that allows most of it to be shot on ordinary roads with two vehicles. It never feels cheap, although the budget is clearly quite low. This is more or less what it would look like if an insane truck driver tried to kill a travelling salesman.



This is a fun movie, and I recommend it. It’s short enough that it doesn’t overstay its welcome, and while plenty of Spielberg’s later work may have been better, I really don’t see any flaws in this movie to speak of.