Showing posts with label Gregory Peck. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Gregory Peck. Show all posts

Monday, May 2, 2016

100 Scariest Movie Moments: #16 The Omen

At some point, I definitely intend to see the full Omen series. (Excluding the made-for-TV fourth film and the remake). I’ve heard that while the later films aren’t as good as the original, the series does manage to avert sequelitis and produce acceptable follow-ups to the first film. However, I can’t say that as more than secondhand information until I’ve actually seen the entire trilogy.

While I do think this movie is good, I believe that it’s far from great. And I think it sadly fails to properly utilize its own premise. The film humanizes the Anti-Christ, and then fails to do anything with that humanization. Instead, the reluctance to kill an apparently innocent child is simply a matter of distaste, without anyone really questioning the morality of murdering someone whose only crime was to draw the short-straw and be Heaven’s enemy through no choice of his own.

Gregory Peck stars as Robert Thorn, the American Ambassador to England whose son dies shortly after birth. Not wanting his wife (Lee Remick) to suffer the trauma of losing a son, he secretly has the dead child switched out with an orphan whose mother died giving birth to him and who has no other living relatives. The child is given the name Damien. (Harvey Spencer Stephens for most of the movie).

Strange things happen around Damien. His first Nanny (Holly Palance) commits suicide at his birthday party while visible to all of the children. She’s promptly replaced by a new Nanny (Billie Whitelaw), who shows up without being called for and secretly tells Damien that she’s there to “protect” him. Damien begins screaming in fear when they come close to a church. And most animals not under the direct control of the Devil seem to fear or hate Damien.

The movie suffers from the rare problem in Hollywood of actually being too subtle. Yes, strange things happen around Damien, but it seems a bit of a leap to go directly to declaring that he’s the Anti-Christ. Hell, if anything, I’d assume that a hoard of angry baboons attacking my son meant he was either haunted or hexed. But this to the conclusion that his son is the Dark Messiah is exactly the leap that Robert makes when Father Brennan (Patrick Troughton... yes, the Second Doctor...) shows up. It takes a while for Robert to accept the idea. But once his wife has an accident, resulting in a miscarriage (Damien’s fault only because he was riding his tricycle and she tripped over him), he’s fully prepared to kill his own son.

Also, anyone trying to make a serious drama about the Anti-Christ should make at least some effort to get some modicum of correct information about the theology. While I don’t claim to be a theologian, I’m well aware that “Armageddon” is derived from “Megiddo,” not the other way around. Also, I think anyone with common sense should be able to figure out that if a biblical passage rhymes in English, it’s more likely a product of the writer’s imagination than of the Apostle John’s.

It’s truly amazing that a movie with both Gregory Peck and Richard Donners’ names attached makes so many missteps. This is supposedly the film Peck came out of retirement to do, but his performance feels phoned in. He’s given a journalist (David Warner) as a side-kick who annoys him for the first half of the film before they team up. The journalist then proceeds to contribute nothing that couldn’t have been achieved by other means. The death of Father Brennan is accomplished by a purely supernatural agent, and the death of Damien’s mother by the Satanic nurse. Thus, the movie passes up both of these deaths as chances to establish Damien as truly evil (if they wanted to go that route).

As for the movie being scary... most of the scares come across as more fun and over-the-top. The one exception, ironically, is the scene in which Robert finally attempts to kill Damien. However, this just further highlights the problem that I didn’t feel fear of this Anti-Christ, but instead, felt fear for him. He’s dragged into a church by his crazed father who wants to stab him to death, and then intentionally destroy his soul.

Once again though, the movie isn’t bad. It feels like a very schlocky B-movie, but not the classic that it’s supposed to be. The movie has its scary moments, but the whole thing just feels so illogical in it’s plotting that I have no idea what the Director was going for. Watch it to be amused, not frightened.

Monday, February 22, 2016

100 Scariest Movie Moments: #36 Cape Fear

Anyone who’s seen both The Night of the Hunter and Cape Fear would have to suspect the Robert Mitchum is some great incarnation of Evil who took up acting as a career. It’s easy for him to give off a terrifying presence, while at the same time coming across as likable. He’s something of an early Hannibal Lecter in that sense, only smoother, and less intellectual.



The plot of Cape Fear is that a rapist named Max Cady (Mitchum) has just been released from prison. He blames a lawyer named Sam Bowden (Gregory Peck), who testified against him for his incarceration. (Yes, he was a witness who just happened to be a lawyer, no I don’t know why the writer did that.) And intends to harass Bowden and eventually rape his young daughter.



This movie is an unintentional period piece due to the legal issues involved. Firstly and most prominently, Cady’s plan revolves around never actually doing anything illegal until near the end of the film, because he never sets foot on Bowden’s property or touches him. However, in the 21st Century following someone around in public so aggressively would be called “Stalking,” and he would promptly be arrested for it. And secondly, Cady’s plan revolves around Bowden being unwilling to make his daughter sit in the same room as her rapist and testify. Given that rape victims are now legally allowed to give video testimony to avoid exactly this scenario, it would also be ineffective.



However, this doesn’t take away from the dread of the film. It goes into so much detail about the legal intricacies of the time in which it’s set that it feels very real. Cady has worked out every single, possible trumped-up charge the police could use against him, and has preemptively addressed them all.



One thing notable about the film is that it never vilifies Cady’s lawyer. He’s established as a decent person who believes Cady is being harassed by the police as they search for something to charge him with. I don’t think it’s unreasonable for a lawyer to start asking questions when his client is arrested, released, searched, and forced to move twice by the police, all in the space of a single week without a single charge being filed. The legal system isn’t broken, Cady is just a monster who’s really good at taking advantage of it.



The thing that makes this movie most frightening to modern viewers is that the word “rape” is never actually uttered. In most modern crime films dealing with a rapist, we’d likely hear the police discussing getting a blood type from his semen and be given the intricate details in all but flow-chart form. However, the Hayes Code was stillin effect when this film was made, meaning that directly referring to rape would have gotten the film banned. So instead, this film makes use of this taboo by making it clear that the characters don’t want to use the word, and the result is terrifying.



The fight sequences at the climax do come off as a bit awkward. My understanding is that this was a result of the filmmakers’ having trouble covering up the fact that Gregory Peck was considerably larger and stronger than Robert Mitchum. They address this somewhat by covering up Peck’s body more than Mitchum’s, which fits with the characters. It works to an extent, but I still get the feeling that if Peck had ever thrown a real punch Mitchum’s head would have gone flying.



Once again though, this is a fairly minor criticism. For most of the film, the primary threat is to Bowden’s daughter. And therefore, even if Bowden was easily able to overpower Cady, he couldn’t have watched her every moment of every day.



This is one of the few black-and-white films that I do find absolutely chilling. Coming out in the early 1960s, it was definitely a time when the Hayes Code was already under heavy fire. People understood that films did not need to be family-friendly affairs, and this was a film that only a moron would have taken a child to see. So don’t show it to your kids, but do watch it.