Much of The Ring Two could
have worked better if the makers hadn’t decided to tie themselves so the
characters of the original.
Fundamentally, Rachel Keller and her son Aidan (Naomi Watts and David
Dorfman) do not have a reason to be in this movie. There’s definitely room to expand Samara’s
(Kelly Stables this time, with Daveigh Chase in archive footage)
backstory. Obviously, if the villain of
your movie is an evil child, and you establish that she’s adopted, there are
questions to be answered about just where she came from.
The idea of “Rings” of risk-takers is
also a good one. Ryan Merriman returns
for the first scene to die and end that storyline. However, they’re horribly underused. As far as I can tell their contribution to
the plot is simply the creation of a large number of copies of Samara’s
tape. This, somehow, makes her more
powerful. They literally had a
convenient source of unlimited new characters lined up, all aware of Samara,
some under threat by her and others already free, and they threw it away.
Samara becoming more powerful might
work, if she simply used her established abilities on a larger scale. However, “more power” simply seems to mean
“forget any established rules,” and Samara begins to get more powers as the
plot requires. Rachel and Aidan come
under fire from everything from levitating water to angry deer, as Samara
attempts to possess Aidan, because that’s a thing she can do now, despite the fact
that he cast off her influence at the end of the last film.
The implication seems to be that
Samara wants a mother, but why she became obsessed with Rachel out of all the
mothers of her long line of victims I don’t know. Why she couldn’t have done this before
gaining an arbitrarily increased amount of power, I also don’t know. It’s just stuff happens, so be afraid,
audience.
I opened the movie expecting to
complain about the performances. The
first few scenes are delivered in the kind of dull, deadpan, depressed monotone
that I periodically complain about in horror films. However, this is gone within a few scenes,
and most of the acting wasn’t good or bad enough to be noticed.
The special effects are at about
that same level. They’re competent
enough for their time to avoid complaints, but not really good enough to merit
much else. I can’t recall going “wow,
that’s a good effect!” at any point.
So, we have a series of events. A series of events I kinda-sorta regret
watching, but not enough to spend any more time worrying about. It’s “a movie,” and that’s all I can say.
No comments:
Post a Comment