I’m probably not
the first to point out the obvious here, although I haven’t
specifically seen anyone else do it: Scream 4
took on horror remakes in an effort to revive
the franchise. It bombed,
and failed to get a sequel, exactly like the remakes it was going
after. In fact, in the climactic scene Kirby (Hayden Panettiere)
recites the names of fifteen horror remakes, only three of which ever
got a sequel (and one
prequel). Of those three,
none made it to a
trilogy. I seriously wonder
what Scream 5 would
have done if it’s entire reference pool of “recent sequels to
horror remakes” was Halloween 2,
The Hills Have Eyes 2,
and Piranha 3DD (and,
I supposed, Texas Chainsaw Massacre: The Beginning).
The
movie is, as of now, probably my second favorite of the series.
While it’s true there was a troubled production, this very much
feels like the logical path these characters would have taken as they
grew over the years. Dewey (David Arquette) is now the sheriff of
Woodsboro, Sidney (Neve Campbell) is on a book tour promoting her
self-help autobiography about how she overcame the hoard of serial
killers coming after her, and Gale (Courteney Cox) is now a would-be
fiction author married to Dewey and confined by the small-town life
and her writer’s block.
The
status of this movie as a new start, and a take on horror remakes,
makes the new characters far less distracting than in the previous
films. While the original three are still safe (and Sidney’s love
interest from the last movie seems to have been abducted by aliens or
something), the new cast integrates themselves effectively. Even
though Scream 5 was
never made, it’s shadow is here, and it’s clear these characters
weren’t written to be one-shots. That does create some real
tension to see which of them will make it to the next movie, which
are the killers, and which get the ax.
In
this movie Ghostface seems to be going after not just Sidney, but her
surviving family. This makes Sidney’s newly-introduced Aunt Kate
(Mary McDonnell) and her daughter Jill (Emma Roberts) primary targets
as well. Through a mixture of Jill’s social circle, and Gale’s
attempts to investigate with the aid of the younger horror buffs, we
get a few other High School characters, throwing us back to the
original. In addition to aforementioned horror-buff Kirby, we get
Film Club co-Presidents
Robbie and Charlie (Erik Knudsen and Rory Culkin), and Jill’s
ex-boyfriend Prime Suspect Trevor (Nico Tortorella).
My
favorite character, however, is Deputy Judy Hicks (Marley Shelton),
who seems to be something of a loose Dewey equivalent for the film,
as the innocent and goofy law-enforcement officer, while also
bringing a new dynamic to the film. As Dewey’s deputy it’s clear
to everyone there’s sexual tension, even as his marriage to Gale
weakens. However, rather than going the obvious route of asking if
they’ll cheat, they both simply suffer in silence as both are far
too moral to ever take part in anything so illicit.
Even
presenting lemon squares to Dewey is done in public, as if to
silently say “I am doing this in full view of the public, so my
morality is not in question.” I
make this sound like some kind of tragic star-crossed lovers plot,
but in practice it’s outright hilarious. Even Gale seems annoyed
at Judy’s uprightness, being unable to challenge her with anything
more than “Your lemon squares taste like ass!”
To
talk about the actual plot: a new Ghostface returns just as Sidney’s
book tour takes her back home, and as an annual Woodsboro screening
of all the Stab movies
approaches. Killing two girls, the killer dumps the bodies in the
trunk of Sidney’s car, keeping
her in town as a “material witness,” staying with her
now-targeted family.
This
Ghostface distinguishes himself from earlier versions primarily
through a more overt obsession with fame. He frequently suggests in
his calls that Sidney has benefited from her victim status, while
leaving Woodsboro and those living in it behind. In that way this
Ghostface is probably more distinct than any of the previous
versions, being more overt with his motive. Ironically, in
attempting to be genre savvy, this Ghostface manages to be sloppier
than any of the previous incarnations, trying to force movie tropes,
and being less prepared to adapt.
The
movie doesn’t lay out the rules of remakes or modern horror as
clearly as the earlier films, and I get the impression that’s
because horror had reached a point where it was no longer as easy to
define. Scream Wiki lists seven rules
for this movie, as opposed to three for all the previous films, but
some of them are much vaguer. For example, “unexpected is the new
cliché,” and “don’t fuck with the Original.” They also note
that virgins “can” die now, and that to survive a modern slasher
“you pretty much have to be gay.”
The
only two rules that define this film clearly, and separately from the
earlier movies are that the ending of the original movie will be a
fake-out ending, and to keep the movies relevant the killer will be
filming the murders with the latest technology. Both of these rules
are played with in clever ways.
The
killer does film the events throughout. It’s not really drawn
attention to as much as you might expect, but it is there. It’s
commented on, and we’re told that the intention is to upload it to
the internet. Given the eventually details we learn of the plan I’m
not sure how the killer was going to explain the footage being
uploaded after killing the
patsy, but that isn’t too distracting.
Since
we all know there will be a fake-out, the movie pulls a double
fake-out. At the half-way point of the film the killer attacks Gale
at the annual “Stabathon,”
in what pretty much everyone in the audience knows to be the
attempted fake-out ending. It’s a party with young people drinking
and watching horror movies, so it fulfills the technical requirements
of a fake-out, without any real effort to fake anyone out. I see
this as entirely intentional: the killer isn’t even trying at this
point, and that lack of effort renders Ghostface off the rhythm of
the movie, as he believes himself to be in the final act going
forward.
In
the set-up of the final act Kate is killed, and the new cast flee to
Kirby’s house, where Trevor
shows up claiming he was sent a text from Jill’s phone, and Charlie
and Kirby begin to fall for each other.
Fearing that Jill is next, the old cast minus the hospitalized Gale,
rushes to Kirby’s to protect her. Ghostface,
of course, shows up, kills Robbie, and kidnaps Charlie, forcing Kirby
into the trailer scene where she has to answer horror film questions
in imitation of the opening of the original. Thinking she won,
however, Kirby approaches Charlie, who immediately stab her (her
survival is a point of contention among fans, the scene showing she
lived was either never filmed or cut, I’m not sure which),
revealing himself as the first killer.
The
second killer, as we find out
with Sidney’s capture, is
Jill. As it turns out, our new target had the goal of assuming
Sidney’s identity within the new “remake” as the soul survivor,
and had manipulated Charlie by recognizing him as a misogynist pig
who she could control with faked sexual interest. Trevor is now
captured, serving the duel roles of Sidney’s father and evil
boyfriend Billy Loomis, as Jill takes him hostage in the role of one
to frame as the other. Only
unlike Billy, Jill is smart enough to off Trevor immediately
after the reveal.
Needing
a second killer, she also
kills Charlie who expected
her to stab his shoulder so
he could be “left for dead,” stabs
Sidney, then seriously wounds
herself in a scene that demonstrates both her obsession and her utter
detachment. Her rants about modern culture and the affects the
internet create an interesting character, although they do sound
somewhat like an older person ranting about “kids these days.”
While her motivation seems a bit weak as reality television finally
seems to be fading from the public landscape, the idea of a stupid
teenager yelling “I don’t need friends I need fans” works as a
character, if not a message.
Also,
while kind of obvious, I do like the idea that Charlie’s implied
ultimate punishment was to die as a virgin, having killed the girl
who would have happily solved that problem. I’m pretty sure
we’re supposed to interpret him as a moron, thinking that the girl
who killed her friends and family for fame would show loyalty to him.
It’s kind of the ultimate
karma for a young person who lets his sexual frustration boil over
into misogyny.
Trying
to think back to the first time I saw this movie, I think I knew a
second fake-out was coming. If nothing else, I was pretty sure they
weren’t going to kill Sidney and
let the killer win (although a series of sequels about Jill with
actual killers after her, as she hides what really happened, does
seem like
a brave direction).
So, the final confrontation happens in the hospital, when Jill finds
out that Sidney might pull through. Before going to finish her off,
Jill makes a slip-up referencing Gale’s wound, which she couldn’t
have known about unless he was the attacker, and Gale, Judy, and
Dewey descend
on the room to protect Sidney. After
a skirmish, Jill is electrocuted, then shot, and we cut to a reporter
calling Jill a “real survivor” and “right out of the movies.”
Irony! Roll credits.
This movie is, in many ways, much closer to the first than either of
the other sequels. It mixes real horror and humor in the same scene.
Jill is easily the second best Ghostface, but the #1 slot is a
pretty high hill to climb. Where Jill came across simply as shallow
an unfeeling, there was a real sense that Billy Loomis was a person
with a truly deep-seated evil that had merely expressed itself
through the avenue of recreating a horror movie. In all probability
Billy Loomis would have been a killer no matter what. I imagine that
if the two had ever met Jill would have tried to take a selfie, and
Billy would stab her while she was doing it.
The
movie hasn’t aged perfectly, as web culture is probably less vapid
than it was at the time of release. The
Jersey Shore is
long gone, replaced by Matpat
producing thoughtful commentary on supposedly “shallow”
entertainment. That said, reading Jill as simply a sociopath,
the movie still works.
No comments:
Post a Comment