I had two reactions to 10
Cloverfield Lane. The first was
a strong suspicion that The Ring
has just been replaced as the go-to example when arguing in defense
of PG-13 horror. This movie is at times terrifying, and I can't
think of a single scene that would have been enhanced with gore or
nipples.
Secondly, I felt a
bit disappointed that the trailer gave away quite as much as it did.
The first few minutes of the film provide plenty of fodder for a
trailer, with our protagonist waking up to find she's been locked in
a room by a strange man played by John Goodman. The trailer gives
away that they're in a bunker and that there's another man with them,
as well as hinting at the outside threat. For a movie that marketed
itself primarily around secrecy, it's amazing just how much is given
away.
However,
you could argue that that's the point. If there is a single element
that runs between the Cloverfield
movies it's marketing that teases a movie with twists and turns, and
then delivers something shockingly straight forward. I don't say
that as a criticism, in our world of shocking twists it's often far
more surprising for a movie to proceed in the most logical manner
possible.
Does that mean that
this movie is without a twist? Not at all, it does have a twist.
But that twist isn't the point. The point of the film is these three
good actors in a tense situation, with John Goodman stealing the show
as a character who can invoke both sympathy and terror with equal
ease. A lot of the film consists both of the characters navigating
their own interactions, and dealing with situations that could
realistically arise from living in a fall-out shelter.
There's apparently
some on the internet who didn't like the twist. I'm not among them.
However, if the movie does have a flaw it's that the twist was
dragged on far too long. I remember sitting in the theatre and
thinking “There's the twist, roll credits!” The movie then
continued for another five or ten unnecessary minutes. I could see
an argument that the finale few minutes are needed to show us how our
main character has been changed by her experiences, but I feel like
the scenes immediately preceding the twist had already put those
changes on full display. The ending comes off as downright
redundant.
That's not to say
the film is bad, however. Even at it's worst it's still
entertaining, and at it's best it's a Masterpiece. It left me hoping
for a long-running anthology of Cloverfield films, and
speculating on what could come next. I can't recommend it strongly
enough.
No comments:
Post a Comment